|
The Classical Monsters Return - But at What Price?
Seemingly hot on the heels of last year's 'League of Extraordinary
Gentlemen' comes what may be this summer's big hit, 'Van Helsing'.
The vampire expert, based on the heroic character from 'Dracula'
created by Bram Stoker, takes on Dracula, Frankenstein, and the
Wolfman in a blaze of top-of-the-range CGI special effects. Does
this mark the end of the self-aware slasher genre inspired by 'Scream',
and a return of the monster greats that have dominated the horror
movie genre since it began? I wouldn't hold your breath.
It's arguable of course to say that Frankenstein and pals never
really went away, the nineties saw big budget remakes of Dracula,
Frankenstein, the Mummy, and the Invisible Man ('Hollow Man'), as
well as variations and cheaper takes on other greats, ('Dr. Jekyll
and Ms. Hyde', 'Wolf', Disney's 'Hunchback of Notre Dame' etc).
However the spirit of those Universal and Hammer greats, wasn't
ever really present, which probably explains why the goth greats
have now pasted over to the fantasy film, to avoid competing with
the ever popular gore-drenched horror genre.
So are the one-time boogie men that stopped child and adult alike
from having a comfortable night now simply figures of fun? Well
even by 1948, when Abbott and Costello got their hands on practically
every monster worth it's salt, the goth greats were already stooges
to brainless comedy, so there's nothing new there. And although
it's probably the only way to squeeze any sort of originality from
the now overly-familiar characters, I do have my reservations about
the new comic book approach that seems to have developed.
Forgotten are 'Frankenstein's warning that man shouldn't play God,
'The Mummy's tale of unconquered love through millennia, and 'The
Wolfman' and 'Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's exploration of man's inner
evil. At least 'Bram Stoker's Dracula' and 'Mary Shelley's Frankenstein'
were attempts make literal versions of the stories, as intended
by the authors, for the first time on the big screen (of course
overlooking several 1970's TV attempts). I now fear that the days
of classical horror appear to be long gone, and the best we can
hope for is a barrage of famous monster fight movies in the vein
of 'Freddy Vs. Jason', heavily reliant on computer generated imagery
and lacking in any kind of quality plot context or interesting characters.
I, like many people, am not a big fan of CGI effects. Sure, it's
the only way some effects can be achieved, but I think it takes
away a chuck of believability. If I had to choose between Christopher
Lee's death scene in 'Dracula', and Aalyiah's in 'Queen of the Damned',
I know which I find more effective, even today. It makes me fear
that we'll now be in for yet more remakes of our favorite horror
stories, this time with plenty of great CGI effects, possibly at
the expensive of now legendary dialogue and plot. I can't wait.
Now I don't want to sound like some whining traditionalist, I hope
that 'Van Helsing' is a great film (and not a colossal flop like
'League of Extraordinary Gentlemen'), and if it is, I hope it's
a box-office success. However, I fear the monster's have once again
become clichéd characters, just as they were when billed
with Abbott and Costello; this time their just stooges for CGI effects.
Whilst I'm sure 'Van Helsing' will be pleasing to the eye, I'm sure
it won't be to taxing for the brain. It now seems that the creations
of Shelley and Stoker are nothing more than horror icons, thrown
together for cheap thrills. I suppose it shows how little respect
the horror genre garners, imagine the outcry if some Hollywood big
shot commissioned 'Hamlet Vs. Jane Eyre'?
|